THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SCAFFOLDED READING EXPERIENCE IN TEACHING READING VIEWED FROM STUDENTS’ INTELLIGENCE

Aksendro Maximilian

Abstract


Reading the English text has always been a nightmare for most vocational school students. However, having good ability in comprehending English text is a must for them since many instuctions which must be read by students are written in English. This research deals with scaffolded reading experience (SRE) as an alternative way in teaching English reading. SRE is a set of pre-reading, during-reading, and post-reading activities which is specifically designed to assist the students in successfully reading, understanding, and enjoying the English text. The objectives of this research are: (1) to identify whether SRE is effective to teach reading; (2) to identify whether students who have high intelligence have better reading ability than those who have low intelligence; and (3) to identify whether there is an interaction effect between teaching methods and students’ intelligence on the students’ reading ability. This is an experimental research which is conducted at SMK PGRI 2 Bandar Lampung. The researcher analyzes the data using ANOVA and Tukey test. Based on the result of data analysis, the research findings are: (1) SRE is effective to teach reading; (2) the students who have high intelligence have better reading ability than the students who have low intelligence; and (3) there is an interaction effect between teaching methods and students’ intelligence on the students’ reading ability. The research result of this study implies that SRE is effective in teaching reading viewed from students’ intelligence. From that result, ideally, scaffolded reading experience could be implemented in the classroom in order to achieve optimal result.

Keywords


Scaffolded Reading Experience; Reading; Intelligence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aiken, Lewis R. 1997. Psychological Testing and Assessment. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Axford, Beverley, Harders, Pam., and Wise, Fay. 2009. Scaffolding Litteracy: an Integrated and Sequential Approach to Teaching Reading, Spelling and Writing. Australia: ACER Press.

Brown, H Douglas. 2000. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Texas: Prentice Hall.

Graves, Michael. F., and Fitzgerald, Jill. 2003. Scaffolded Reading Experiences for Multilingual Classrooms. Chirtopher: Gordon.

Graves, Michael. F., and Graves, Bonnie. B. 2003. Scaffolded Reading Experiences: Designs for Student Success. Chirtopher: Gordon.

Graves, Michael. F., and Liang, L. A. 2003. On-line resources for fostering understanding and higher-level thinking in senior high school students. Oak Creek: National Reading Conference Press.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. How to Teach English. Edinburgh: Pearson Education Limited.

Maximilian, Aksendro. 2012. The Effectiveness of Scaffolded Reading Experience to Teach Reading Viewed from Students’ Reading Anxiety. Unpublished Thesis. Solo: UNS Solo.

Maximilian, Aksendro. 2013. The Effectiveness of Using Scaffolded Reading Method in Teaching Reading for Vocational School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Bumi Raflesia. 2 (1), 25-36.

Maximilian, Aksendro. 2015. Reducing Students’ Foreign Language Reading Anxiety Using Scaffolded Reading Experience. Jurnal Kependidikan Lentera, Volume 1 Tahun 2015, 19-36.

Persons, Richard D, Hinson and Deborah Brown. 2001. Educational Psychology: a Practitioner Research Model of Reading. Warthsworth.

Peterson, P. 1979. Direct Instruction Reconsidered. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Rosenshine, Barak. 2008. Five Meanings of Direct Instruction. USA: Center on Innovation and Improvement.

Santrock, John W. 1990. Educational Psychology. New York: Mc Graw hill.

Tuckman, Bruce W. 1978. Conducting Educational Research. New York: Harcourt Brace Javanovich, Inc.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Conference on Education and Language (ICEL)
Bandar Lampung University
ISSN: 2303-1417