The Effectiveness of Using Dialogue and Prose Passage Techniques Improving Speaking Ability of The Students at Muhammadiyyah University Tangerang
Abstract
The researcher realizes that speaking ability is difficult to be achieved because it depends on many factors. Sometimes, the student speaks English because the teacher tells them to speak and to get good marks, but they communicate outside the classroom with their mother tongue. , It can be stated that there are only a few students who have ability in speaking English. The problem of this research are: (1) is there an effect of the use of dialogue on the students’ speaking ability in Muhammadiyah University Tangerang, (2) is there an effect of the use of prose passage on the students speaking ability in Muhammadiyah University Tangerang, (3) is the use of teaching speaking through dialogue more effective than the use of teaching speaking through prose passage.
Based on the identification of the problem above, the objectives of this study are to investigate: a. There is an effect of the use of dialogue on the students’ speaking ability, b. There is an effect of the use of prose passage on the students` speaking ability, c. The use of teaching speaking through dialogue is more effective than the use of teaching speaking through prose passage In this research, the instrument of collecting data was speaking test by an open interview. An interview is used to measure how far the students’ ability in speaking English. The researcher used cluster random sampling, thus one group was A.1 selected in the experimentalal groups and the control class was A.2 for control group.
The description of data can be seen that mean in experimental class (A.1) was 75.25. It means that the mean is higher than the mean in control class (A.2) was 69.50. The minimum scores in experimental class were 55, and the minimum scores in control class is 50. The maximum scores in experimental class were 90, and the maximum scores in control class were 85. The ranges of the scores were 35 point. The median in experimental class (A.1) was 75, and the control class (A.2) was 70. The mode of the data in experimental class (A.1) was 75, and the control class (A.2) was 70.
Based on data analysis and comparison of the result of the pre-test and the post-test in experimental class (A.1) and control class (A.2), it was found that: (1) there was an effect of the use of dialogue on the students’ speaking ability in Muhammadiyah University Tangerang rang, (2) there was an effect of the use of prose passage on the students speaking ability in Muhammadiyah University Tangerang (3) the use of teaching speaking through dialogue is more effective than the use of teaching speaking through prose passage. The writer puts forward some suggestions that might be useful for any teacher who teaches English as a foreign language. The lecturer should present dialogue activities by giving clear instruction to the students in order to help them in implementing it. Secondly, to eliminate boring situation, the lecturer should take the dialogue for appropriate level of the students. Next, the lecturer had better not to be involved in the role dialogue activities but the lecturer should just guide and control them. Finally, The lecturer should choose the appropriate approach, method, and techniques in speaking.
The result of this research is expected to be beneficial for all English lecturers who teach in the speaking class. The result showed that both dialogue and prose passage were important in students speaking ability. However, introducing the topic and chose a suitable speaking material preferable to make the students’. Becoming aware of their speaking ability in comprehend of the speaking ability through dialogue and prose passage, this research was hoped to be as the bases of the reader to identify their most appropriate technique based on their own speaking ability.
Keywords
References
Alexander R J. 2000. Culture and pedagogy; international comparisons in primary education, Oxford, Blackwell
Ann, Melissa, Broeckelman. 2004. A dialogic approach for teaching the basic public speaking course. B.A., Kansas State University
Anthony, E.M. 1963. Approach, method and technique English Teaching
Arikunto. 1996. Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktek. Jakarta: Rhineka Cipta.
Bakhtin, M. 2001. From Marxism and the philosophy of language. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
Berardo. www.simmalieberman.com/articles/dialogueQ&A.html
Bohm, D.1996.On Dialogue. Routledge:Classics
Booth-Butterfield, M.1989. The interpretation of classroom performance feedback: an attribution approach. Communication Education
Brown, Douglas. 2001. Language Assessment. San Francisco state University: Longman
Byrne, Donn. Teaching Oral English .British: Longman
Chaney, A.L and T,L. Bulk 1998. Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
Chase, Donald J. and Ishler, Margaret 1975. Teaching in a Competency Based Program. College of Education. Bowling Green State University, USA.
Ellis, K. 1995. Apprehension, self-perceived competency and teacher immediacy in the laboratory-supported public speaking course: Trends and relationships. Communication Education.
Jones.Rhordi.1989. Speaking and listening. London.
Lieberman. www.simmalieberman.com/articles/dialogue
Marianne Celce. 1979. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. Newbury House Publisher.Inc
Matott, G.1976. In search of a philosophical context for teaching composition. College Composition and Communication
Matthews, Candance.1994. Speaking Solution. Prentice Hall Regent, New Jersey
Mercer, N. 1995,The guided construction of knowledge. Clevedon: Multilingual matters
Pride,J.B.1971. The Social Meaning of Language,Oxford Univ.Press. London.
Scott. W. 1990. Teaching English to Children. Longman. London New York.
The Oxford Pocket Dictionary of Current English.2008.Originally published by
Oxford University Press 2008. http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1O999-prose.html
Wikipedia:Manual of Style. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prose May 2008
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
International Conference on Education and Language (ICEL)
Bandar Lampung University
ISSN: 2303-1417