Comparative Analysis of Load Factor Method Static and Dynamic Method (Case Study Akdp Bus Route Rajabasa - Bakauheni)
Abstract
Along with the increasing mobility of the population, then the users are demanding the availability of inter-city transportation are eligible smoothness, comfort and safety. It is also worth noting that the operator provides services angkutan.Operator certainly will not be able to serve well if not achieving the target of economic benefits. This is closely connected with the passenger load factor on a given route. To get a load factor (load factor) are known methods of static and dynamic methods. Each of these methods have shortcomings and kelebihannya.Trayek Rajabasa - Bakauheni AKDP bus served an important tool in making the transportation of passengers from Sumatra towards Java. So for performance that will be investigated how the operator is indicated by factors muatnya.Penelitian intends to see bus load factors, by comparing the static method with dynamic survey methods on the route that serve transportation between cities in the province that connects the city of Bandar Lampung in the South Lampung is also the gateway to the island Jawa.Dari analysis and calculations obtained by the method of static load factor LF values obtained Sunday morning at 45.33%, while the evening LF obtained a value of 24.44%. LF Monday morning at 39.11%, while the LF night obtained a value of 35.11%. From the analysis and calculation of Dynamic Methods for directions Rajabasa - Bakauheni obtained Load Factor on Sunday morning at 57.09%, while the evening LF obtained a value of 31.70%. LF Monday morning at 55.98%, while the LF night obtained a value of 46.98%. For directions Bakauheni - Rajabasa obtained Load Factor on Sunday morning at 63.31%, while the evening LF obtained a value of 36.35%. LF Monday morning at 61.50%, while the LF night obtained a value of 53.95%. Regression analysis of the results obtained equations that represent relationships Static and Dynamic Load Factor direction Rajabasa - Bakauheni is: y = -3.859 + 3.955 x x2 - 0.422, the value of coefficient of determination, R ² = 0,972. As for the direction of Bakauheni - Rajabasa equation: y = -4.677 + 4.585 x x2 - .479, with a value of R ² = 0.988
Keywords
References
............., 1993, Peraturan Pemerintah No. 43 Tahun 1993 tentang Prasarana dan Lalu Lintas Jalan, Aneka I, Semarang
............, 1997, Manual Kapasitas Jalan (MKJI), Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, Direktorat Jenderal Binamarga, Jakarta.
............., 1994, Transportation Reasearch Board National Research Council, Special Report 209 Third Edition, Washington. DC.
Box. P.C, Joseph C. Oppenlander, 1976, Manual of Traffic Engineering Studies, Institute of Transportation Engneering, Arlington, Virginia.
Dewanti, 1992, Crossing Behaviour and Gap Acceptance at an Insignalized Intersection in Bandung, Thesis S-2, ITB, Bandung
Edwards J. D, 1992, Transportation Planning Handbook, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
Garber, N.J, Hoel, L.A, 2002, Traffic and Highway Engineering, Third Edition, University of Virginia
Gattis. J.L, Member, ASCE, and Low S.T, 1999, Gap Acceptance At Atypical Stop-Controlled Intersections, Journal of Transportation Engineering/may/june.
Hobbs, F.D, 1979, Traffic Planning and Engineering Second edition, Pergamon Press, Birmingham.
Hummer J.E, 1994, Manual of TransportationEngineering Studies, Institute of Transportation Engineering, by Prentice-Hall, inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Hewitt, R.H., 1985, A Compatison Between Some Method of Measuring Critical Gap, Traffic Engineering and Control.
Khisty. C.J, Kent L.B, 2005, Transportation Engineering, An Introduction/Third Edition. Published by Pearson Education,
May, A.D, 1990, Traffic Flow Fundamental. Pretice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
McShane, W.R, Roess. R.P, 1990, Traffic Engineering, By Prentice Hall inc, Englewood, new Jersey.
Morlok EK, 1985, Pengantar Teknik dan Perencanaan Transportasi, ahli bahasa oleh Johan K. Hainim, Erlangga, Jakarta.
NAASRA, 1988, Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice, National Association of Australian State Road Authotities, Sydney.
Selter. R. J, 1974, Highway Traffic Analysis And Design, University of Bradford.
Selter. R.J, 1981, Traffic Engineering Worked Examples, University of Bradford, London
Sudjana, 1996, Metoda Statistik, Tarsito, Bandung
Sukarno, dkk, 2003,Penentuan Gap di Suatu Simpang Tiga Dengan Rambu Yield atau Rambu Stop, Jurnal Teknik Sipil Vol 4 No. 1
Taylor. M.A.P, Young,W, 1988, Traffic Analisys New Technology & New Solution, Hargreen Publishing Company, North Melbourne.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
International Conference on Engineering and Technology Development (ICETD)
Bandar Lampung University
ISSN: 2301-5690