. Munjiana


Young learners are usually described as learners aged between 6 to 10 or 11 years old. To teach this age group means to understand them, know what their attitudes, opinions and interests are. There are some characteristics which teachers should bear in mind when preparing activities and teaching young learners. This is a heterogeneous group with different kind of motivation for learning. It mostly depends on teachers how they introduce the subject they teach and how they attract their attention. This paper will discuss one of the newest technical equipment, the Interactive White Board (IWB), which is quickly entering schools and helping teachers with their work. The aim of this paper is to inform interactive whiteboard materials for educators teaching English as a foreign language at Primary schools. It will also look at some possible advantages and disadvantages of using IWB, how easy or difficult it is to use, what effect it has on their motivation, and what actually is so fascinating about it.


Interactive Whiteboard; EYL; motivation.

Full Text:



Bacon, D. (2011). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change. Information Technology in Education Journal, (pp 15-18).

BECTA. (2008). Harnessing technology schools survey: Analysis and key findings. Retrieved from dir/downloads/page_documents/research/ht_schools_survey07_key_findings.pdf

Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution – Teaching with IWBs. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.

Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. London: Routledge.

Chapelle, J. (2003). How is the interactive whiteboard being used in primary school. Becta Research Bursary. Retrieved from

Cogill, J. (2002). How is the interactive whiteboard being used in the primary school and how does this affect teachers and teaching? Retrieved from:

Cooper, B. (2003). The significance of affective issues in successful learning with ICT for year one and two pupils and their teachers: The final outcomes of the ICT and the Whole Child Project. Leeds University: Leeds, UK.

Dale, E. (2008). Cone of learning. Retrieved from .

Davies, L. (2008). Motivating children. Retrieved from .

Gerard, F., & Widener, J. (1999). A smarter way to teach foreign language: the smart board interactive whiteboard as a language learning tool. Retrieved from

Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 5–20.

Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted learning. 21, 102-17.

Halliwell, S. (1993). Teacher creativity and teacher education, in D. Bridges & T. Kerry (Eds) developing teachers professionally. London and New York: Routledge

Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K. & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 283-301.

Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning Media and Technology, 32(3), 213-225.

Kent, P. (2003). E-teaching- the elusive promise. Retrieved from

Lee, M., and Boyle, M. (2003). The educational effects and implications of the interactive whiteboard strategy of richardson primary school: a brief review. Retrieved from

Levy, P. (2002). Interactive Whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. Department of Information Studies (DIS), University of Sheffield. This report draws on Masters dissertation research carried out by Clara Crehan and Chrispin Hamooya, DIS, University of Sheffield, 2000-2001.

Lopez, O. S. (2010). The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners’ academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 54(4), 901-915.

Miller, D. & Glover, D. (2002). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change: The experience of five elementary schools in an English Education Authority. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 5–9.

Miller, D., Glover, D., & Avris, D. (2004). Matching technology and pedagogy in teaching mathematics: Understanding fractions using a ‘Virtual Manipulative’ fraction wall. Retrieved from

Miller, D., Glover, D. & Averis, D. (2005). Developing pedagogic skills for the use of the interactive whiteboard in mathematics. Retrieve from

Morgan, G. L. (2008). Improving student engagement: Use of the interactive whiteboard as an instructional tool to improve engagement and behavior in the junior high school classroom. (Doctoral dissertation, Liberty University). Retrieved from

Murcia, K. & Sheffield, R. (2010). Talking about science in interactive whiteboard classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 417-431.

Phillips, S. (1993).Young learners. New York: Oxford UP.

Rassool, N. (2000). Contested and contesting identities: Conceptualising linguistic minority rights within the global cultural economy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 21(5), 386–398.

Reardon, T. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in school: Effective uses. Media and Methods, 38(7), 12.

Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 39–56.

Slay, H., Sieborger, I. & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just "lipstick"? Computers & Education, 51, 1321-1341.

Schmid, E. C. (2008). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1553-1568.

Shenton, A., & Pagett, L. (2007). From 'bored' to screen: The use of the interactive whiteboard for literacy in six primary classrooms. Literacy, 41(3), 129-136.

Smith, H., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboard: Boon or bandwagon? A criti-cal review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91-101.

Smith, P. et al. (2008). National foundation for educational research. Retrieved from:

Solvie, P. A. (2001). The digital whiteboards as a tool in increasing student attention during early literacy instruction. Retrieved from

Solvie, P.A. (2004). The digital whiteboard: A tool in early literacy instruction. Reading Teacher, 57(5), 484–7.

Tate, L. (2002). Using the interactive whiteboard to increase student retention, attention, participation, interest and success in a required general education college course. Retrieved from

Thompson, J., & Flecknoe, M. (2003). Raising attainment with an interactive whiteboard in Key Stage 2. Management in Education, 17(3), 29-33.

Torff, B. & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(2), 379-383.

Ur, P., & Andrew, W. (1992). Five-minuute activities. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated things: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851-867.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

International Conference on Education and Language (ICEL)
Bandar Lampung University
ISSN: 2303-1417