The Analysis of Conditional Sentence Errors Pattern in Writing Sentences of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 5 Bandar Lampung

Fangky Adetia

Abstract


Making errors is expected to lead to some improvements in future learning. The general purpose of this research is to find out the students' errors in using conditional sentences in writing sentence.This study uses descriptive qualitative research. The data, which were retrieved from students’ conditional sentence writing. A class of eleventh grade students (Class XI IPA 3) science class of SMA N 5 Bandar Lampung. Data analysis discovered that most of the students still made all of the four error types under the heading of surface strategy taxonomy.The error types that were identified in the students’ conditional sentence writing were ranked for the surface strategy taxonomy, errors in misformation amount to 166 errors (54.07%), omission 74 errors (28.46%), addition 18 errors (6.94%), and misordering only 1 errors (0.38%). For each type of the conditional, type one got omission 46 errors (17,76%), misformation 19 errors (7.33%), addition 7 errors (2.7%), misorderin 1 error (0.38%), on type two got misformation 62 errors (23.93%), addition 11 errors (4.24%), and omission 10 errors(3.86%), on type three misformation 85 errors (32.81%),  and omission 18 errors(6.94%). These figures suggest that teachers should take necessary instructional steps (for example through a series of extensive and intensive practices on grammar) as a follow-up to improve students’ grammar competence, without leaving the importance of spontaneity and overall meaning in writing.

 


Keywords


error analysis; grammatical errors; conditional sentence; writing

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Armstrong, S, Mclvor G, McNeill, F. and McGuinness P. 2013. International Evidence Review of Conditional (Suspended) Sentences. Canbera. Canbera University press

Azzar, Betty Schrampfer. 1999. Understanding and Using English Grammar. New York:Prentice Hall Regents.Brown, H.D. 1982. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.

Brown, D.H. 2000. Principles of Language learning and Teaching.Edition Fourth. SaanFransiscoStatae University: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Corder, S.P. 1981.Error Analysis and Interlanguage.New York: Oxford University Press.

Creswell, John W. 2012. Educational Research. New York: Nerbraska University.

Dullay, H, Marina B. and Krashen, S. 1982. Language Two.New York: Oxford University Press.

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2000). English Teaching in Indonesia. EA Journal, 18(1), pp. 22-30.

Ellis, Rod.1986. Understanding Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Els, T.V. 1984.Applied Linguistics and the Learning and Teaching of Foreign Languages.Great Britain: Edward Arnold Publishers.

Ellis, Ro. 1986. Understanding Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haerazi, M.Hum.2011. PendekatanPembelajaran Bahasa .SamuderaBiru. Yogyakarta.

Hariyono, Rudy. 2002. Complete English Grammar. Surabaya: Gitamedia Press.

Harmer, Jerremy.1991. English language Study and Teaching Foreign Speakers. New York: Longman.

James, Carl.1998. Error in Language Learning and Use: exploring error Analysis. London and New York: Longman.

Lowenberg, P. H. 1991. English as An Additional Language in Indonesia. World Englishes, (1), pp. 127-138.

Mcmillan, James H. 1996. Educational Research: Fundamental for the Consumer.Virginia: Commonwealth University.

Nur, C. (2004). English Language Teaching in Indonesia: Changing Policies and Practices. In H. w. Kam& R. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), English Language Teaching in East Asia Today: Changing Policies and Practices (2 ed., pp. 178-186). Singapore: Eastern University Press.

Oshima, A. (1991). Writingacademic English (3rd ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Phillips, Deborah.2001. Complete Course for The TOEFL Test. New York: Longman.

Richards, J. C. And Rodger. T. S. 1986. Approach and Method in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seidlhofer, Barbara.(2005. English as a Lingua Franca’. In: ELT Journal 59/4 (on-line). 6 Des. 2013. http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/59/4/339.pdf

Setiyadi, B. 2006.Metode Penelitianuntukpengajaran BahasaAsingPendekatanKualitatifdanKuantitatif.Yogyakarta: PenerbitGrahaIlmu.

Supono, I &Cahya, W. 2004. PanduanMenguasai 16 Tenses. Jakarta: KawanPustaka


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Conference on Education and Language (ICEL)
Bandar Lampung University
ISSN: 2303-1417