Students’ Understanding on Cultural Concept: Case Study in Mathematics Department
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to know how far the Mathematics students in 2013/2014 have ability to know the culture of the cultures in short stories. The method of this research is descriptive analysis. While the approach that we use is culture’s approach. Focus group discussion in this research is to find the result of analysis from the students. The result, first the students able to understand about the culture from the short stories that given. Second, almost the students do not know the short stories culture’s. Third, all of the students agree that Focus Group Discussion is a good technique to help the students understand the literary works.
Keywords
References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta Rineka Cipta.
Damono, Sapardi Djoko. 2005. Pegangan Penelitan Sastra Bandingan. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.
Damono, Sapardi Djoko. 2009. Sastra Bandingan: Pengantar Ringkas. Jakarta: Editum Kompleks Dosen UI.
Darma, Budi. 2004. Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa.
Endraswara, Suwardi. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.
Endraswara, Suwardi. 1983. Metodologi Penelitian Sastra: Epistemologi, Model, Teori dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Widyatama.
Fakih, DR Mansour. 2005. Analisis Gneder dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Greimas, A.J. 1972. Semantique Structurale. Paris: Larousse.
Hainich. R., et, Al. 1996. Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Hannafin, M. J., Peck. L.L 1998. The Design, Development and Evaluation of Instructional Software. New York: Mc. Millan Publ., Co.
Hutomo, Suripan Sadi. 1991. Mutiara yang Terlupakan: Pengantar Studi Sastra Lisan. Surabaya: HISKI Komisariat Jawa Timur.
Hutomo, Suripan Sadi. 1993. Merambah Matahari: Sastra dalam Perbandingan. Surabaya: Gaya Masa.
Jabrohim (Ed). 2001. Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Hanindita
Jabrohim. 1996. Pasar dalam Perspektif Greimas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
_______. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Hanindita Graha Widya.
Junus, Umar. 1988. Karya Sebagai Sumber Makna; Pengantar Strukturalisme. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Kementrian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2001. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Koenjaraningrat. 2000. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
Luxemburg, Jan Van & Mieke Bal Willem G.W. 1984. Pengantar Ilmu Sastra. Diterjemahan oleh Dick Hartoko. Jakarta: Gramedia Daftar Pustaka.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bnadung: Remaja Rosda Karya
Miles, Mathew B. dan A. Michael Huberman. 1988. Qualitative Data Analysis. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia
Murniati, A. Nunuk P. 2004. Getar Gender. Magelang. Indonesiatera
Nazir, Moh. 1983. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Noor, Redyanto. 2005. Pengantar Pengkajian Sastra. Semarang: Fasindo.
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. 2005. Teori Pengkajian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.
Piaget, Jean. 1995. Strukturalisme. Diterjemahan oleh Hermoyo. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Ratna, Nyoman Kutha. 2004. Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ratna, Nyoman Kutha. 2005. Teori, Metode, dan Teknik Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Sugihastuti. 2002. Teori dan Apreasiasi Sastra. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar Offset
Sudjiman, Panuti. 1984. Kamus Istilah Sastra. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Wellek, Rena dan Austin Warren. 1989. Teori Kesusastraan (diterjemahkan Melani Budianta). Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Zaidan, Abdul Rozak dkk. 2007. Kamus Istilah Sastra. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
International Conference on Education and Language (ICEL)
Bandar Lampung University
ISSN: 2303-1417