Linguistically Grounded Techniques for English in the Professional Institutions of Rural India

Kumari Pragyan


This paper discusses some of the linguistically grounded techniques for teaching English. It sets up the story of English in the context of education in India. Its implications in the professional institutes would help students become aware of the intricacies of language. This awareness will help overcome difficulties in learning English. Students in professional institutes can be prepared with this methodology to acquire English not only as a second language but as a part of international education. It would provide them a landscape through which it is possible to take various journeys; its horizons are redefined by each approach.



ELT; international education; linguistics; professional institutes; rural India

Full Text:



Agnihotri, R. K. (2007). Towards a Pedagogical Paradigm Rooted in Multilinguality. International Journal of Multilingual Research 1.2: 1-10.

Agnihotri, R. K. (2009). Multilinguality and a New World Order. In Mohanty, A.K., Panda, M., Phillipson, R. and Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (eds.) Multilingual Education for Social Justice: Globalizing the Local (pp. 268-77). New Delhi: Orient BlackSwan.

Bhatt, R. (2001). World Englishes. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30: 527-550.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use, New York: Praeger Publishers.

Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row. xiv, 470 pages. Reprinted 1991, Boston: MIT Press.

Dasgupta, P. (1993). The Otherness of English: India’s Auntie Tongue Syndrome. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Guha, Ramachandra (2004). "Hindi chauvinism". The Hindu (The Hindu Group). Retrieved 2009-11-26.

Gussenhoven, Carlos. Jacobs, H. (1998). Understanding Phonology. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, Edward Arnold Publishers Limited.

Hayes, Bruce. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hayes, B. (2009). Introductory Phonology. Wiley-Blackwell, A John Wiley Publication.

International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jarratt, Susan C. (1991). Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.

Koul, Omkar N. (2008). Modern Hindi Grammar. Dunwoody Press6564 Loisdale Ct., Suite 800 Springfield, VA 22150, USA.

Krashen, Stephen D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications, London: Longman Group.

Mollin, Sandra (2006). Euro-English: assessing variety status. Gunter Narr Verlag.

Nehru, Jawaharlal; Gandhi, M. K. (1937). The question of language: Issue 6 of Congress political and economic studies. K. M. Ashraf, New Delhi.

Pandey. Pramod (2007). Phonology–orthography interface in Devanagari for Hindi. Written Language and Literacy, 10 (2): 139-156.

Richards, Glynn (1996). A Source-Book on Modern Hinduism, Routledge.

Rosen, Stanley. (1983). Plato's 'Sophist', The Drama of Original and Image, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

Selkirk, E.O. (1984). Phonology and Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Said, Edward W. (1978). Orientalism. Vintage Books, New York.

Trevelyan, Sir George Otto. (1876). The Life and Letters of Lord Macaulay. Oxford University Press, Oxford.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

International Conference on Education and Language (ICEL)
Bandar Lampung University
ISSN: 2303-1417