Ida Madieha bt. Abdul Ghani Azmi


The signing of the Transpacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA)  between twelve member countries, with Malaysia included, has set a new, higher benchmark for copyright enforcement. In three ways, the landscape of copyright law has been changed significantly. First, TPPA expand the coverage of the kinds of Intellectual Property recognised. Secondly, what constitute copyright violations has been expanded. Thirdly, sanctions for copyright piracy has been made tougher and sentencing lengths for such piracy has been lengthened.  The usage of trade agreements to compel countries to improve copyright domestic policy is not a new strategy. The antecedent to TPPA  is the TRIPs Agreement that was concluded on the basis that copyright piracy and counterfeiting has grown from just mere domestic nuisance to an effective barrier to free trade. This paper addresses the TPPA and analyses the rationale to the introduction of more stringent measures under TTPA.  It seeks to understand the shift in the discourse of the policy makers regarding the 'severity' of copyright offences. It examines questions such as to what extent should copyright infringement be criminalised? Even if it is criminalised, why must it be imposed with more severe penalties than an ordinary economic crime?


Copyright Piracy

Full Text:



Alexander, I., Criminalising Copyright: A Story of Publishers, Pirates and Pieces of Eight, The Cambridge Law Journal, 66 [2007], 625-656.

Bitton, M. 2012. Criminal Law: Rethinking the Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement's Criminal Copyright Enforcement Measures,102 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 67.

Flynn, S.M. , Brook Baker, Margot Kaminski & Jimmy Koo (2012), the U.S. Proposal for an Intellectual Property Chapter in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, 28 American University International Law Review, 105.

Manta, I.D., 2011 The Puzzle Of Criminal Sanctions For Intellectual Property Infringement Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Volume 24, Number 2 Spring 2011

Haber, H., Copyright's Technological Technologies Interdependencies, 18 Stan. Tech. L. Rev. 247.

Howell, T.M., 1996. Intellectual Property Pirates: Congress Raises the Stakes In the Modern Battle To Protect Copyrights and Safeguard the United States Economy, 27 St. Mary's L.J. 613.

Martin, B., & Newhall, J., Criminal Copyright Enforcement Against File sharing, North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology, Vol 15, Issue 1: October 2013

Kaminski, M., Copyright Crime and Punishment: The First Amendment's Proportionality Problem, 73, Md L. Rev. 587 2013-2014.

Killpatrick-Lee, D.L., Criminal Copyright Law: Preventing A Clear Danger to the US Economy or Clearly Preventing the Original Purpose of Copyright Law? 14 U. Balt. Intell. Prof. L.J. 87 2005-2006.

Litman, M. 2007. Frontiers of Intellectual Property: Lawful Personal Use, 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1871.

Minnock, S., Should Copyright Laws Be Able to Keep Up With Online Piracy, 12 Colo. Tech. L.J. 523 2014.

Saw C.H, 2010. The Case for Criminalising Primary Infringements of Copyright- Perspectives from Singapore, Int J Law Info Tech (2010) 18 (2): 95.

Vinall, J., The Criminal law's treatment of twenty-first century copyright pirates: A treacherous new frontier for property offences, 2013 Oxford U. Undergraduate L.J. 57 2013.

Weatherall, K., Intellectual Property Law Enforcement and the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), American University International Law Review, 26 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 839


  • There are currently no refbacks.

International Conference On Law, Business and Governance (ICon-LBG)
Bandar Lampung University
ISSN: 2339-1650