Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility Implementation And Social Audit at PT Semen Padang
Abstract
The number of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) implementation in Indonesia is not so much
while the potential targets are very huge, such as environmental damage, unemployment, school drop-out,
and poverty. One of its implementations that are common now is community development, which the
emphases are on social and community capacity development. This study describes the implementation of
CSR and social audit in PT Semen Padang. PT Semen Padang as one of the largest states owned
enterprise in West Sumatra has a big hand in the development of West Sumatra.
Analyses were performed with descriptive statistics and content analysis. Collecting data on the CSR
activities of PT Semen Padang was done by performing content analysis on the company's annual report
that has been audited. Results of the analysis showed CSR’s model implementation in PT. Semen Padang
is on the form of physical development such as public facilities, development of education, employment
empowerment, economic empowerment, community services, public health services, environmental
protection, sports, and the arts. A pattern of implementation of CSR programs is generally done directly
and independently by a company-appointed team. PT Semen Padang has not implemented purely social
audit of the implementation of the CSR report, but integrated in the audit of the company's annual report.
Keywords
References
Allouche, J. & Laroche, P., 2005, A Meta-Analytical Investigation of The Relationship between Corporate
Social Performance, Revue de Gestion des Resources Humanizes 57; Jul-Sep.
Baron, D. P. M., 2007, Managerial Contracting and Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Public
Economics. forthcoming.
Bhattacharya, C. B. & Sankar, S., 2004, Doing better at doing well: When, why and how consumers respond to
corporate social initiatives, California Management Review 47 (1); 9-24.
Boyd, Graham (1998), Social Auditing: A Method of Determining Impact,
http://www.caledonia.org.uk/socialland/social.htm (retrieve 10 March 2008)
Caroll, A.B, 1999, Corporate Social Responsibility, Evolution of Definitional Construct, Business and Society,
Vol 38 no. 3, Sept 1999. p 268-295.
Donaldson, T & Preston, Lee E., 1995, The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and
implications, Academy of Management Review 20; 65-91.
Ezo Olen Dino, 2009, Implementasi Corporate Social Responsibility pada PT Semen Padang, Skripsi
Fak.Ekonomi, Univ Andalas Tidak Dipublikasikan.
Fry, F. & Hock, R.J., 1976, Who Claim Corporate Responsibility? The Biggest and the Worst. Business and
Society Review/Innovation, Vol. 18.
Garriga, E. & Mele, D., 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility, Theories, Mapping and the Territories, Journal
of Business Ethics Vol 53, p 51-71.
Heal, G.M., 2008, When Principles Pay: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Bottom Line, Columbia
University Press.
Hill, C.W.L. & Jones.T.M., 1992. Stakeholder-Agency Theory. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 29, No. 2,
p. 131-154.
Jones, T.M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of
Management Review, 20, 404–437.
Kotler, Philip & Lee, Nancy, 2005. Corporate Social Responsibility, Doing The Most Good for Your Company
and Your Cause, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Mathews, M.R., 1997. Twenty-Five Years Of Social And Environmental Accounting Researches There A
Silver Jubilee To Celebrate? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 487-53.
M.A.Effendi , 2008, Implementasi GCG Melalui CSR, 7 November 2007, retrieve from www.
muharieffendi.wordpress.com.
Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup pada Seminar Sehari "A Promise of Gold Rating : Sustainable CSR"
Tanggal 23 Agustus 2006, diambil dari www.menlh.go.id
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L. & Rynes, S. L., 2003, Corporate social and financial performance: A metaanalysis,
Organization Studies 24 (3); 403-441.
Sofyan S Harahap, 2007, Teori Akuntansi, Edisi Revisi, Raja Grafindo Persada.
Steiner, G.A. & Steiner, J.F., 2006, Business, Government & Society: A Magerial Perspektif, McGraw Hill
Corp.
Stemler, Steve, 2001. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17).
Retrieved February 1, 2009 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.
Swa Media Grup, 2006, www:swa.co.id=programCSR2006
Ullmann, A.R, 1985, Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships among Social
Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firm. Academy of Management. Vol. 10.
No, 3, 540- 557
Undang-undang No 40/2007, tentang Perseroan Terbatas dan Undang-undang No. 25/2007, tentang Penanaman
Modal, 2007, Penerbit Pancuran Alam , Jakarta.
Wu, M.L., 2006. Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance, and firm size: A metaanalysis.
Journal of American Academy of Business 8 (1): 163-171.
http://www.semenpadang.co.id
http://www.swa.co.id
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
International Conference On Law, Business and Governance (ICon-LBG)
Bandar Lampung University
ISSN: 2339-1650