The Effect of Use Styrofoam for Flexural Characteristics of Reinforced Concrete Beams

. Yasser, Herman Parung, M. Wihardi Tjaronge, Rudy Djamaluddin

Abstract


In general bending loads acting on structural elements of concrete beams arrested by the bottom cross secttion on the compression area while the tension area is ignored. Therefore, it is reasonable if the concrete beam section on the tension area is minimized with concrete mass reduction in tensile region by ignoring concrete tensile stress while receiving static loads or the area is filled with styrofoam concrete (styrocon). One effort to effeciency concrete economic value by reducing the concrete and use of styrocon thus component volume of natural materials, such as sand mining, coarse aggregate, and cement and weight of construction becomes smaller. Styrofoam as waste can be used as filler to reduce the volume of concrete, especially for areas where the concrete section is not working mechanically. In an effort to study the flexural strength of external reinforced concrete beams and styrofoam-filled composite, then performed a series of tests. Test material in the form of beams with dimensions of 15 cm x 20 cm x 270 cm. Test material consisted of normal beam quality 26.0 MPa concrete with transverse reinforcement as a control beam and test materials with external transverse reinforced and truss systems and styrofoam-filled composite. In the normal-styrocon composite beams with various content of styrofoam. Beam placed on 2 simple supports with 2 point loading test method. Results showed flexural capacity of the normal concrete beam is 36.7 kN, but the external reinforced beams decreased 30.6 kN, but external reinforced truss system beams is relatively equal 35.8 kN. But external reinforced beams prone to corrosion and fire and require maintenance. Therefore used styrocon on the outer portion with styrofoam content of 30%, 40%, and 50% who had a flexural strength of each 33.8 kN, 31.0 kN and 29.0 kN. It can be concluded that the use of composite concrete beams normal-styrocon can efficiency use natural materials to reduce the weight of the concrete beam and construction as well as having environmental aspects by using the waste.


Keywords


flexural strength; sandwich concrete beams; styrocon; external reinforcement; monotonic load

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Jacobsen, S. (2006). Lecture Notes, BM3. Trondheim: NTNU.

Nawy, E. G. (1998). Reinforced Concrete A Fundamental Aproach. Third Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Schaumann, E., Valle, T. and Keller, T.(2008). “Direct Load Transmission in Sandwich Slabs with Lightweight Concrete Core”. Journal of Tailor Made Concrete Structures-Walraven & Stoelhorst (eds), Taylor & Francis Group, London, 849-855.

Satyarno. I. (2006). “Ligthweight Styrofoam Concrete for Lighter and More Wall Ductile”. Jurnal HAKI, Yogyakarta.

Giri, I. B. D., Sudarsana, I. K., dan Tutarani, N. M. (2008). “Kuat Tekan dan Modulus Elastisitas Beton dengan Penambahan Styrofoam (Styrocon)”. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil Vol. 12, No. 1, Denpasar.

Skjølberg, O. G. and Hansson, A. (2010). “Hybrid Concrete Structures : Experimental Testing and Numerical Simulation of Structural Element”. Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Nes, L. G. and Overli, J. A. (2011). “Composite and Hybrids Investigation of Material Parameters and Structural Performance of a Concrete Sandwich Slab Element”. fib Symposium PRAQUE, Session 5-6.

Salmon, D. C. and Einea A. (1995). “Partially Composites Sandwich Panel Deflections”. Journal of Structural Engineering. ASCE, Vol. 121, No. 4, April, 778-783.

Despandhe, V. S. and Fleck, N. A. (2001). “Collapse of Truss Core Sandwich Beams in 3-Point Bending”. International of Solid and Structures, Pergamon, 38, 6275-6305.

Kocher, C., Watson, W., Gomez, M. and Birman, V. (2002). “Integrity of Sandwich Panels ands Beams with Truss-Reinforced Cores”. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 15, No. 3, July, 111-117.

Liu, J. S. and Lu, T. J. (2004). “Multi-Objectif and Multi-Loading Optimization of Ultraweight Truss Material”. International Journal of Solids and Structures, Elsevier, 41 (2004), 24 September 2004, 619-635.

Kabir, M. Z. 2005. “Structural Performance of 3-D Sandwich Panel Under Shear and Flexural Loading”. Journal of Scientica Iranica, Vol. 12 No. 4, October 2005, 402-408.

Wight, J. K. and MacGregor, J. G. (2005). Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design. Sixth Edition, Pearson.

NOTASI

a = Height Whitney rectangular stress block (mm)

As = Area of cross section of tensile steel reinforcement (mm2)

As’ = Area of cross section of compresion steel reinforcement (mm2)

b = Width of beam (mm)

c = Distance to the outer edge of the neutral line (mm)

d = Effective reinforcement steel Height (mm)

d' = Concrete cover thickness (mm)

f'c = Compressive strength of concrete (N/mm2)

fy = Yield force of steel reinforcement (N/mm2)

h = High beam (mm)

Icr = Moment of inertia of cracked reinforced concrete section (mm4)

Ig = Moment inesia reinforced concrete section (mm4)

Mn= Moment nominal section (N.mm)

Mu= Moment ultimate section (N.mm)

ND= Resultant compressive force above the neutral line (N)

NT = Resultant tensile force below the neutral line (N)

z = Distance resultant tensile force to the resultant compressive force (mm)

β1 = Coefficient correction Whitney rectangular stress block height (mm)

εcu =Ultimate concrete strain press


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Conference on Engineering and Technology Development (ICETD)
Bandar Lampung University
ISSN: 2301-5690