Time Expansion and Clear Speech to Improve Speechrecognition in Older Adults

. Supeno, Lusy Tunik Muharlisiani, Danny Yatika

Abstract


Speech understanding deficits are common in older adults. In addition to hearing sensitivity, changes in certain cognitive functions may affect speech recognition. One such change that may impact the ability to follow a rapidly changing speech signal is processing speed. When speakers slow the rate of their speech naturally in order to speak clearly, speech recognition is improved. The acoustic characteristics of naturally slowed speech are of interest in developing time-expansion algorithms to improve speech recognition for older listeners. In this study, we tested younger normally hearing, older normally hearing, and older hearing-impaired listeners on time-expanded speech using increased duration and increased intensity of unvoiced consonants. Although all groups performed best on unprocessed speech, performance with processed speech was better with the consonant gain feature without time expansion in the noise condition and better at the slowest time-expanded rate in the quiet condition. The effects of signal processing on speech recognition are discussed. 


Keywords


clear speech; speech recognition;time expansion

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Bond Z, Moore T. A note on the acoustic-phonetic characteristics of inadvertently clear speech. Speech Commun 1994;14:325–27

Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gilmore C. Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST). Ear Hear 1987;8:119S–26S

Crandell C, Henoch M, Dunkerson, K. A review of speech perception and aging: Some implications for aural rehabilitation. J AcadRehabilAudiol 1991;24:121–32

Gaeth JH. A study of phonemic regression in relation to hearing loss [dissertation]. Evanston (IL): Northwestern University; 1948

Gordon-Salant S. Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing. J AcoustSoc Am 1986;80(6):1599–607

Gordon-Salant S, Fitzgibbons PJ. Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997;40:423–31

Nejime Y, Moore B. Evaluation of the effect of speech-rate slowing on speech intelligibility in noise using a simulation of cochlear hearing loss. J AcoustSoc Am 1998; 103:572–76.

Payton KL, Uchanski RM, Braida LD. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. J AcoustSoc Am 1994;95:1581–92

Picheny MA, Durlach NI, Braida LD Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing I: Intelligibility differences between clear and conversational speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1985;28:96–103.

......................the hard of hearing II: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1986; 29:434–46.

..........................the hard of hearing III: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1989;32:600–3

Plomp R. A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. J Speech Hear Res 1986;29:146–54

Schum D. Intelligibility of clear and conversational speech of young and elderly talkers. J Am AcadAudiol 1996;7:212–18

Sharma A, Kraus N, McGee T, Carrell T, Nicol T. Acoustic versus phonetic representation of speech as reflected by the mismatch negativity event-related potential. ElectroencephalogrClinNeurophysiol 1993;88:64–71.

Stevens K, Blumstein S. The search for invariant acoustic correlates of phonetic features. In: Eimas P, Miller J, editors. Perspectives on the study speech. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1981. p. 1–35.

Tun P. Fast noisy speech: Age differences in processing rapid speech with background noise. Psychol Aging 1998;13:424–34

Tyberghein J. Presbycusis and phonemic regression. ActaOtorhinolaryngolBelg 1996;50:85

Uchanski R, Choi S, Braida L, Reed C, Durlach N. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1996; 39:494–509

Vaughan N, Letowski T. Effects of age, speech rate, and type of test on temporal auditory processing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997;40:1192–1200.

Wingfield A. Speech perception and the comprehension of spoken language in adult aging. In: Park DC, Schwarz N, editors. Cognitive aging. Philadelphia (PA): Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis; 2000. p. 175–95.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


International Conference on Education and Language (ICEL)
Bandar Lampung University
ISSN: 2303-1417